DW post by Brian

Discussion in 'The mystical and Paranormal' started by AED, Mar 7, 2024.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. any name you wish

    any name you wish Archangels

    I bet Tucho would be into this.
     
    Clare A likes this.
  2. "Quis ut Deus"

    "Quis ut Deus" ADMIN Staff Member

    we must never forget master of deception master of lies diabolical distortion ?? do I need to go on ???

    Holy Spirit teach us wisdom and prudence, Amen
     
    Jo M, Jason Fernando, Byron and 3 others like this.
  3. BrianK

    BrianK Powers Staff Member

    Josephite shared this privately and it is crucial and needs to be considered also:


    Fr Mawdsley is very restrained and compassionate towards poor Lusia.
    I will continue to pray for her soul.

    What I find most despicable about the writings of LP, is her blasphemy against the Blessed Virgin Mary. Throughout her writings she subtly distorts (and thereby destroys) the pre-eminence of Our Lady's role in redemption.

    However in 2 writings she takes this distortion to a whole new level of Blasphemy.
    One called the nine excesses of love,
    https://bookofheaven.com/prayers/nine-excesses-of-love/

    In this, Lusia has the pseudojesus stating that his time in the womb of Our most Holy Mother was painful, suffocating and an agony to the point of death and in fact it was only Lusia who sustained him while in the womb of Mary. So outrageous!

    Secondly in what is called the Hours of the passion
    https://www.quies.org/hours_of_passion.pdf
    And on page 74 Lusia has not only Our Lady crying out with the crowd of Jews “Crucify Him!” but also God the Father! There is no distinction of the permissive will of God and the Holy Divine will of God. It is abominable!

    As a mother who has lost a child, I know Mary sorrowed and accepted the permissive Will of God but in No way did she join the evil cry of satan and call out for Jesus to be crucified.

    Here is the paragraphs below....

    Jesus, my Love, allow me to sustain You, because I see that, unable to stand under the weight of so many pains, You stagger. Ah, in this solemn moment, your destiny is decided. At the words of Pilate, all become silent – in Heaven, on earth, and in hell! And then, as though in one single voice, I hear the cry of all: “Crucify Him, crucify Him – we want Him dead at any cost!”​

    My Life, Jesus, I see You tremble. The cry of death descends into your Heart, and among these voices, You recognize the voice of your dear Father, which says: “My Son, I want You dead, and dead crucified!” Ah, You hear also your Mama who, though pierced and desolate, echoes your dear Father: “Son, I want You dead!” The Angels, the Saints, hell – everyone, in one voice cries out: “Crucify Him, crucify Him!” There is not one soul who wants You alive. And – ah, ah! to my deepest blush, sorrow and horror, I too feel forced to cry out, by an irresistible force: “Crucify Him!"

    I wish Father would address this
     
  4. Clare A

    Clare A Archangels

    That was my thought. Shudder…
     
    AED and Mary's child like this.
  5. Seagrace

    Seagrace Archangels

    Mark Mallett included.
     
    Jo M, Jason Fernando, Sam and 4 others like this.
  6. BrianK

    BrianK Powers Staff Member

    I do hope Mark has the prudence and wisdom to step away from this until further clarification from the Vatican is forthcoming.
     
  7. Adoremus

    Adoremus Powers

    Yes, I started watching Daniel's video but turned it off as he seemed just very emotional and lashing out. I'll continue watching to see if he actually addresses the troublesome passages in a convincing way.

    A reminder of the danger of getting so heavily invested in a private revelation that doesn't have the approval of the Church. How do you dig yourself back out again?
     
  8. Seagrace

    Seagrace Archangels

    I watched for just a few minutes. Daniel came across as condescending. As AED said, his anger was palpable. To me it was not righteous anger as much as it seemed to come from pride. When he brought up blasphemy of the Holy Spirit, I felt I had had enough.
     
  9. Clare A

    Clare A Archangels

    I didn’t watch all of Fr Mawdesley’s video. After a few minutes I’d had enough. I had the feeling that LP was a childless woman who may have longed for a child. Very sad, and the devil took advantage of her.
     
  10. HeavenlyHosts

    HeavenlyHosts Powers

    The problem is that he is such a public figure. Most of us can just go to
    Confession and leave the DW stuff alone.
     
    Santa Fe, Seagrace, Jo M and 5 others like this.
  11. AED

    AED Powers

    That was my experience too. A few minutes and I was pretty put off and disturbed. I turned it off.. Poor woman. Fr Mawdsley feels she was taken in and abused by an extremely subtle demon.
     
  12. Santa Fe

    Santa Fe New Member

    And Christine Watkins, if Im not mistaken And Christine Bacon. And Fr Jim Blount, And Xavier Reyes - Ayral. And Monique and freinds of Mother and Refuge of the end times. And others ?

    I am trying to make a mental list in my mind of all who jumped on this bandwagon so that I can stop listening to them. Now I understand why Christine Watkins called her website " Countdown to the KINGDOM".

    I havnt slept well since Fr Mawdsleys first expose of this but Im very thankful he has done this.
     
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2024
  13. AED

    AED Powers

    Yes. This needed to be known. Sadly Frances Hogan is a big proponent also.
     
    Santa Fe, Seagrace, Jo M and 5 others like this.
  14. Santa Fe

    Santa Fe New Member

    Yes and Hugh Owen, the Creationist, seemed to get into it quite early, some years back. I am very sad about the whole thing. But I no longer want anything to do with those " internet influencers " who led people down this garden path to Hell.
     
    Jo M, Jason Fernando, AED and 3 others like this.
  15. HeavenlyHosts

    HeavenlyHosts Powers

    Yes, there is a hugely tragic component to all of this.
     
  16. HeavenlyHosts

    HeavenlyHosts Powers

    Thanks for this listing.
     
    Seagrace, Jo M, AED and 1 other person like this.
  17. Santa Fe

    Santa Fe New Member

    Yes, the pages / passages were lifted directly off of Daniels website. D. says so himself in one of his ranting rebutting response videos , ( the first one, i believe). So he knew all about the passages but was refusing to see the obscene nature of the passages and was seemingly expecting everyone of his audience to aquiesque.
     
    Seagrace, Jo M, Sam and 4 others like this.
  18. Santa Fe

    Santa Fe New Member

    He needs to retire/ retreat into solitude now, and do penance for his part in leading good Catholic people badly astray. Leading people into a cult. As do the others who promoted it to many many people through their vast audiences.

    We must pray for the Church as a whole (not just the Korean Bishops), to declare that this is a FRAUD and BAN the books and the Cenacles and the prayer groups.

    This is a disaster.
     
  19. Santa Fe

    Santa Fe New Member


    It is by no means complete and I hope I have not been mistaken in any, but this is my memory of it.

    I could add Fr Celso and Fr Iannuzzi. I have not followed either of them.

    I know Fr Chris Alar invited Daniel to speak and debate with him awhile back. which I thought was extremely imprudent at the time. But I believe Fr Chris will be sure to see that that was a mistake and say something publicly about it.
     
    Last edited: Mar 8, 2024
  20. Christy1983

    Christy1983 Principalities

    In case readers here missed it, Fr. Mawdsley plans three videos. He's broken them down as follows:

    Part 1 of 3: Showing the 'DW' devotion is repulsive.
    Part 2 of 3: Examining grave theological errors in the 'DW'.
    Part 3 of 3: Tracing the diabolical origins of the 'DW'.

    I'm certain the "diabolical origins" video will spark an outpouring of anger, maybe more so than the first video did. Father has not indicated when he'll drop that. I'm sure BrianK will post that in the two other threads.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page