Thanks Mario, I felt the same about pnf's post and was praying I read his post wrong. You just confirmed my thoughts.
PNF, After my rebuttal, I discovered I was wrong, and that you have posted previously back in 2019; I see you have been a student of eschatology for a long time. From your previous post, I glean you have sensed a connection between eschatological passages in the Scriptures (as from Daniel) and the disturbing history in the Catholic Church in the last 60 or so years. Most MOG members are also concerned, and on that you and I can agree. Our Lady will crush the head of the serpent soon enough. May we both find ourselves together with our Queen when the dust settles. O Mary conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee!
Mario, Quis ut Deus said to Danielle the following: That statement by Quis ut Deus is incorrect on multiple points. The very fact that the Code of Canon Law lays out very specific conditions for papal resignations and elections means that it is possible for those conditions to not be met, otherwise the canons would be superfluous. Therefore, the existence of these canons implies that fallible men play a part in papal elections and those men must be monitored and their actions must follow the law in order to be valid. Alternatively, please find me an official Church document published with Magisterial authority that proposes the theological position that "the Holy Spirit elects our Pope." Also, please show me where the Church says it is "a sin of grave consequence" and a "sin against the Holy Spirit" "to believe that the election of [a] Pope was a fraud." When you find that, I will take back everything I said about the statement and behavior of Quis ut Deus.
No harm done, Mario. I apologize that I sounded uncharitable in my comments. But I felt that I needed to defend Danielle against an unfair accusation. Even if one doesn't agree with her, I don't think she should have been banned from the forum for saying what she said. JMJ
I deleted PNF. I will delete anyone who suggests Our Holy Father is not Pope . To do such a thing publically inccurs automatic excommunication and is heretical. I will not be a party to such a thing by permitting it.
To the thread topic, yes I believe it will happen. I would love to be present if possible. Yet I don't know if that will be the case. Once the Warning comes, things will be clearer, especially since the Miracle will be announced 8 days in advance. I think I'll happy enough to hear of the Miracle from afar than needing to view it in person. I believe the Seers have said the Miracle can be photographed and seen on video/television etc right? So that'll be good enough.
Awk hey ho no need for an apology for me. I'll defend the forum from the garbage you can defend the trolls. Good luck with that
At least, PNF provided a partial apology. I find that an unequivocal apology is rare. It is like saying I was absolutely wrong without adding a string of "buts". Safe in the Arms of the Father!
Error non habet ius. Error has no Rights. This is not open for discussion, it is a matter of forum rules. Press this and you too will be deleted. Call it Fascist, call it Cancel Culture , call it and insult me anyway you like, but press this issue and you will be very quickly gone yourself. There are plenty of other places on the internet to promote Schism, God have mercy on us, but you will not be doing it here.