Some time back when this evidence was first surfacing, warning flags went up for my wife (she worked treating cancer patients for a number of years and has a discriminating eye); she said the photos used didn't even look like coroner's tables. She concluded the article had a veneer of propaganda and set it aside. This clip strikes me as much more focused on topic. Our younger daughter is a nurse still pressured to toe the line regarding boosters. They both will have to see it. Lord have Mercy!
A good friend of mine is a nurse and is totally pro jab. She refuses to see the truth. I have another friend and one sister who thank God for the jab. Nothing can change their minds. Maybe they put something in the jab that damaged their thinking but I don't try to convince anyone anymore about the dangers of it.
The Latin is dative, so it's 'for me' or 'to me'. quia fecit mihi magna, qui potens est, et sanctum nomen eius Edit - also dative in Greek
Biological elements of the divine nature??? 2 natures (divine and human). Christ did not receive His divinity from Mary. From the first instant of conception Mary's soul had sanctifying grace, a share in God's own life. So in some way she shared in the divinity...Just as at Mass we pray to "share in the divinity of Christ who humbled himself to share in our humanity". "God’s communicable attributes (goodness, holiness, and love) as opposed to his incommunicable ones (omniscience, omnipotence, omnipresence, and absolute simplicity)". But I don't believe it is correct to say microchimerism causes biological transmission of divine nature. Microchimerism refers to something corporal (biological). The Divine Nature is incorporeal. I don't think divine nature can be transmitted biologically. St Thomas Aquarius (Summa 3): "the Divine Nature is incorporeal; nor after the manner of form and matter, for the Divine Nature cannot be the form of anything, especially of anything corporeal, since it would follow that the species resulting therefrom would be communicable" Please correct me if I am wrong. The following article is excellent at defining substance, person, and nature... https://www.catholic.com/magazine/online-edition/is-jesus-a-human-person
I'm not a native English speaker, but I don't think I said or implied that Jesus Christ inherited His divine nature from His Most Holy Mother... What I said was exactly the opposite, that Our Lady must have acquired some elements of that divine nature from Her Divine Son that She carried 9 months in Her womb with whom She was organically linked. I don't know if the expression "biological elements of the divine nature" is the most correct in English. What I meant to say is that, if this theory of fetal microchimerism is scientifically valid, the Precious Blood of Christ was present within the womb of Mary in its biological and organic condition and some of its cells passed into Mary's blood and remained in the your own body after pregnancy and made biological changes in Her own body. In Christ, the human and divine natures are inseparable as a whole or in each part, as His Sacred Heart, His Precious Blood and - as could not be otherwise - His Divine Cells, including those that passed into the bloodstream of His Most Holy Mother and were assimilated by Her body. We are here reflecting on biology and theology topics on a nanoscale, something that has not been done and could not have been done in the past. I do not have academic training in these areas to speak about them with authority, I can only humbly reflect and meditate on that. However I think this topics would be an interesting line of study for today's theologians, instead of spending so much time reflecting on the virtues of homosexual practices or persistent adultery.
I took a few vaccines, simply in order to avoid maximum restrictions during the lock-down. The same applies to my wife. Thankfully, we don't seem to have any ill-effects, as yet. We continue to hear reports of 'vaccinated' people getting COVID, frequently a quite severe form. On the other hand, there are many reports of people contracting measles, in Ireland, and the health authorities attribute this to a reduced uptake of the MMR vaccine. I have no doubt that their latter assertion is correct, but it poses the question as to the effectiveness of these COVID 'vaccines', when, in contrast to the MMR, people who have received multiple shots continue to contract illnesses due to the target virus. As vaccines, again unlike the MMR, they seem ineffective, possibly because that is not their purpose.
