‘Blessing’ homosexual couples ‘flings the door open’ to the demonic, exorcist’s assistant warns Kyle Clement, assistant to exorcist priest Fr. Ripperger, warned that the ‘real danger’ in blessing homosexual ‘couples’ is that ‘it affirms the soul' in mortal sin, 'this becomes a millstone moment for the priest.’ Gorodenkoff/Shutterstock (LifeSiteNews) — In a multi-part interview with LifeSiteNews, Kyle Clement, assistant to well-known exorcist Father Chad Ripperger, both of whom have long experience in exorcism and deliverance ministry, explained the way in which Freemasonry is rooted in Satanism, and the way in which Masonic curses invoke demonic influence on a person and their descendants. The exorcist’s assistant also explained the ways in which Freemasons have infiltrated the Church in the marked promotion of unqualified persons to places of ecclesiastical authority. Denouncing the grave sins and scandals of priests and bishops, which have plagued the Church in recent decades, the exorcist’s assistant warned that the blasphemous invocation of a priestly “blessing” on a homosexual “couple” or a couple living in sexual sin, such as is now proposed by Fiducia supplicans, “flings the door wide open” to the demonic for priests. From his long experience with such matters, Clement recommended recourse to Our Lady to overcome the wholesale attack on marriage and the faith that we are seeing today both within the Church and outwith. This interview will be published in several instalments. Below is the first: LifeSiteNews: Can you explain the difference between imprecatory blessings, those given by way of command in virtue of one’s spiritual authority over some person or thing, and deprecatory blessings, those offered through a prayer of petition addressed directly to God? Under what category do priestly blessings fall? Is it ever the case that a priestly blessing is not a liturgical act as Cardinal Fernandez has claimed? Kyle Clement: An imprecatory blessing is: “I,” then “my name,” then there’s a blessing, “bless you.” A classic example is a blessing that is missing in the domestic church, within the home, and it’s very simply: “I, your father, bless you in the name of our Father, God Almighty.” That’s an imprecatory blessing correctly discharged. Now, as the head of my household and as the father of my children, I can only give that blessing in my household and to my children. So that’s a very limited use of the imprecatory form. The difference is that [with] a priest of the Most High God, all of his blessings are imprecatory, because he’s configured to God in such an ontological way that he cannot act “as a man.” The idea that a priest is just a man is a false idea. There’s an ontological, metaphysical change that conforms him to God Almighty as a sacrifice set aside. In his life, in his thoughts, words, deeds – everything must comport to that, the new identity, the new ontological conformity to God. And so [Cardinal] Fernández is wrong about this, as he is about many other things, and there’s not a way to explain it [away], there’s not a way to massage anything. Every priestly blessing is a liturgical act, is an affirmation of that person’s status within the Church. This is the whole point of [a] benediction. LSN: If a priest “blesses” a couple living in adultery or fornication, or a homosexual “couple,” will this invite demonic activity rather than God’s blessings, since he is invoking the name of Christ and the blessed Trinity upon a couple constituted by a mortally sinful sexual relationship? KC: The real danger in this type blessing is that it affirms the soul in a state of habitual unrepentant mortal sin. And in doing so, this becomes a millstone moment for the priest. What does that mean? “Better that a millstone be tied around his neck and him cast into the sea, than to lead one of these little ones astray.” (Mt 18:6) Very simply, this is a millstone moment for the priest. And [it] needs to be said. As such, this is a very dangerous thing. LSN: Does the desecration of the priestly office through some sacrilegious activity, such as the attempt to impart a blessing to couple constituted by a sinful sexual relationship, or through the commission of some sexual sin, invite or open a priest up to demonic activity or influence? KC: It absolutely does. It flings the door wide open. The other thing, too, is the sins of these clerics. There is a list of priests and bishops who have accessed deviant websites and places, such as Grindr, and others that have viewed pornographic material and/or [committed] paedophilia. They’ve been involved in improper things and have improper associations that are known. They should be suspended, very simply. This needs to be addressed. The fostering and promotion of the homosexual lifestyle and activity among the priesthood is absolutely impermissible. It’s canonically prohibited. And yet this is one that has infiltrated the seminaries to [such] an extent that young, righteous, orthodox men are being drummed out of the seminaries. Ongoing association with McCarrick, having been promoted by him, defending him – those individuals need to be censured, if not laicized. They need to certainly be investigated. And the same with pedophilia. This hierarchy has given lip service to [addressing] pedophilia, [and] to various other things, but at the end of the day, they have not addressed it adequately, especially when you have a cardinal who is presiding over [an] orgy and has a police record for having done this multiple times, [who] now becomes the spokesman for a false ecumenical outreach or dialogue with Freemasons who are known to him. He should not even know these people. When will we say ‘Basta! Enough. This is enough.’? When will we do that? LSN: Are there demons of homosexuality, adultery, and fornication that are driving the push to bless and legitimize these sins within the Church? How can such an attack on the Church and on marriage be countered? What are the spiritual weapons to be used? KC: Excellent question. This speaks directly to Our Lady, the apparition at Fatima when Our Lady said the last attack will be on marriage. It absolutely is the attack on marriage. Now, we should understand that in the holy sacrament of matrimony, matrimony is taken from matris, which means the office of motherhood. This attack is directly against the Blessed Mother and her motherhood of Christ, King of the Universe. This is militating against rightly ordered motherhood, marriage, matrimony. All of this becomes a mockery. How interesting that there is a mockery of womanhood by homosexual men. You don’t see lesbian women mocking manhood. Homosexual men mock mothers. They mock motherhood. They mock the feminine. And that is where the focus of the attack is. The focus of the first attack was on the woman, on Eve. Now we see this playing out again. What are the weapons? The weapons are to return to a time when there was, not perfection, but much more purity than we have now; which is to openly call out as a group, as lay faithful, and say, we will not be led into this howling wasteland, this howling wasteland devoid of virtue, truth, and goodness, this howling wasteland of modernism, and relativism, and equivocation, this howling wasteland where anyone can be called a saint, but no one is saintly, this false ecumenicism which says that Freemasonry may now walk into the Church that it has constantly militated against, this upside down, right is wrong is right, that celebrates Martin Luther, one of the greatest enemies of the Church, and a person whose name and whose action has done more damage than any other single individual to the integrity of the deposit of the faith. We’ve got to stop and say we must return to right reason and right order.
Supplicans Ends Dialogue with Coptic Church The Coptic Orthodox suspended dialogue with Francis' Church at its plenary session on 7 March (CopticOrthodox.church). The Copts are the main Orthodox Church in Egypt. Historically they have denied the human nature of Christ. The meeting was attended by 110 of their 133 bishops. It was led by Pope Tawadros II, whom Traditionis-Custodes Francis allowed to celebrate a liturgy in Rome's St Paul's Basilica in 2018. Citing Scripture, the Copts reaffirm their firm opposition to homosexuality. They explain that "any blessing of such relations of whatever kind" is "a blessing for sin" and "this is unacceptable". Key phrase: "It was decided to suspend the theological dialogue with the Catholic Church, to re-evaluate the results of the dialogue achieved since its beginning twenty years ago, and to establish new norms and mechanisms for the continuation of the dialogue". The break with the Copts comes after the Russian Orthodox called Francis' homosexual propaganda piece 'Somoda supplicans' a "very serious departure from Christian moral norms". https://gloria.tv/post/Lm8GvvxRS7yU21j8JyNJQ7Tgc
What would John XXIII think of someone who destroys part of the ecumenical dialogue he started at the council?
Imo, I think were he to pop back into this world as it is now, he would be utterly confused and dismayed by what's happened. My own question for many years: How is it even possible to reconcile "ecumenical dialogue" with true evangelization?
I think it is possible in some way, but by focusing on what is really essential to the faith, for example, many Orthodox become self-confident when they see the terrible crisis of faith occurring in Catholicism during this pontificate; but how many could be surprised to learn of the message of Fatima that providentially occurred in the same year as the Bolshevik revolution, which also martyred many of their ancestors of faith in Russia? Fatima denounced the apostasy we are currently experiencing, which shows that Catholicism is still the true religion and an apparition authenticated by a miracle of biblical proportions proves this. I also think that many Catholics, Orthodox and even Protestants could come together to translate all the patristic literature that has not yet been catalogued, and in this way they could form common study groups on patristics that was fundamental for Scott Hann's conversion.
How many Catholics would even know this today? I agree with what you say; it would be possible with good will, and an open mind to history, tradition and Truth. But for the regular everyday person living in the world, who does not know any history and who is unsure if God even exists and perhaps has lost the will to keep seeking the Truth, I'm not so sure this would help. There are, imho, many people out there who truly want to believe. Maybe they pick up a catechism and start to read, maybe even something from Scott Hahn. But the problem is, they look around and see that things "on the ground" are not what they should be. And many of those charged with "teaching, governing and sanctifying" are not helping. There is a good little book by Warren Carroll called 1917: Red Banners, White Mantle. Maybe that would be a good place to start for people who may show an interest in such things.......(I'm more or less thinking out loud here. I never know where to send people anymore who do like to talk about such things......) ~ "A captivating account that narrates, month by month, the events of 1917. This is popular Catholic history at its finest. The drama of the Great War and the Russian Revolution are juxtaposed with the spiritual dimension of the Age: the diabolism of Rasputin, the Apparition of the Virgin at Fatima, the malignancy of Lenin, the saintly courage of (the now blessed) Charles of Austria. Few standard histories have ever given such a high degree of consideration to the supernatural and the Christian interpretation of history as 1917 does."
The Following article is so beyond scandalous its hard to put into words. It is about Father Wolfgang Rothe (of Germany somewhere) deplorable and unconscionable acts (graphically evidenced) and entirely demonic. When I starting reading the article and all of Wolfgang Rothe disgusting act, deeds and litigations, I naturally assumed he was of course laicised. I was sickened to read near the last few paragraphs that he is still a priest! In a parish no less. This article shines a whole new light on the truth of Kyle Clements statement, "Fiducia Supplicans, flings open the door to demons" as it exposes the gigantic millstone around the neck of this priest and dare I say the millstone around the neck of complicit hierarchy. Disgraced homosexual priest attends Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence drag ‘ordination’ in Germany Father Wolfgang Rothe, a former seminary vice-rector who resigned in disgrace after a homosexual and child pornography scandal, has become notorious for his LGBT activism, though Cardinal Reinhard Marx and the Vatican have refused to punish him. Fr. Wolfgang Rothe (LifeSiteNews) — A scandal-plagued homosexual priest known for his LGBT activism has promoted the anti-Catholic hate group “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence.” In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Father Wolfgang Rothe thanked the drag queen group for inviting him to a sacrilegious mock “ordination” of a man in drag who calls himself “Sister Magdalena Lydia,” accompanied by pictures of the event. “Many thanks to the Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence for inviting me to the ordination of Sister Magdalena Lydia in the LEZ! It was an honor and a joy to be there!” Rothe wrote. The “Sisters of Perpetual Indulgence” are a group of men in drag who revel in acting out in public, often sexualized parodies of sacred Catholic events, such as the birth of Christ and the Way of the Cross, and work, in their words, to “expiate stigmatic guilt,” which involves burlesques in protest of traditional Christian morals on gender and sexuality. They have also fundraised for pro-LGBT causes and a proposition to legalize marijuana. The group earned international fame after being honored by the L.A. Dodgers baseball team in June 2023, a decision that drew massive protests by faithful Catholics and conservative groups. In August 2023, a member of the group, 53-year-old cross-dresser Clinton Monroe Ellis-Gilmore, was arrested after committing an indecent act near a child-friendly park in Northern California. Wolfgang Rothe: The most notorious pro-LGBT priest in Germany Rothe, who is openly homosexual, is one of the most aggressively outspoken promoters of the LGBT agenda in the Catholic Church in Germany. In 2004, Rothe was involved in a major Church scandal when he had to step down as vice-rector of a seminary in St. Pölten, Austria, after child pornography and photographs depicting homosexual activity involving seminarians and staff emerged. Photos also showed Rothe kissing a man. The seminary was eventually shut down by the Vatican’s special investigator, Bishop Klaus Küng. Rothe and rector Ultrich Küchl were accused of allowing homosexual activity in the seminary. Bishop Küng said at the time that the seminary was defeating its purpose by turning out young men utterly unfit to serve the Catholic Church, citing the Church’s prohibition on ordaining men “who have deep-seated homosexual tendencies.” In 2021, Rothe sued Polish priest Father Dariusz Oko for “hate speech” for publishing an article exposing homosexual abuse within the Church. A German court subsequently fined Oko, in a move sharply condemned by Cardinal Gerhard Müller. Rothe was also one of the activists behind an initiative in which Catholic clergy “blessed” homosexual “couples” in over 100 events celebrated throughout Germany on May 9 and 10, 2021, shortly after the Congregation (now Dicastery) for the Doctrine of the Faith had declared in a response to a dubium that the Church did not “have the power to bless unions of persons of the same sex.” After the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith released the heterodox declaration Fiducia Supplicans in December 2023, Rothe was hailed as a “pioneer for the rights of queer people [sic] within the Catholic Church” by the prominent German newspaper Süddeutsche Zeitung. The Catholic Church condemns homosexual activity as “intrinsically disordered,” mortally sinful, and a “sin that cries to heaven,” in accordance with Sacred Scripture and the constant Tradition of the Church. The Church also teaches that homosexual tendencies themselves are objectively disordered. Regarding homosexuality, the Catechism of the Catholic Church states: Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that ‘homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered.’ They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved. Despite Rothe’s outspokenness in his public dissent from Catholic doctrine, he has not faced any canonical punishment by the Vatican or Cardinal Reinhard Marx. Rothe currently serves as a parochial vicar in the parish association of the Perlach district in the city of Munich, which belongs to the Archdiocese of Munich and Freising, headed by Marx. Marx has also rejected Catholic teaching on sexuality and falsely claimed that homosexuality is not sinful. While a public dissenter like Rothe has not been suspended or threatened with excommunication by the Vatican, clergymen who speak out against questionable political decisions or heterodox theological statements by the Vatican or Pope Francis have frequently received punishment. Prominent examples of orthodox bishops Francis has punished include Bishop Joseph Strickland, Bishop Daniel Fernández Torres, and Cardinal Raymond Burke. Moreover, in recent years, local bishops in the West have suspended numerous faithful priests for celebrating the Traditional Latin Mass or speaking out against homosexuality. At the same time, dissenters from Catholic teaching typically do not receive any punishment. Pope Francis has not sanctioned Marx or other heretical German bishops for repudiating Catholic teaching on homosexuality and allowing homosexual “blessings” and other LGBT activity in their dioceses.
