For the mystery of lawlessness is already at work … in those who are to perish, because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. Therefore God sends upon them a strong delusion, to make them believe what is false, so that all may be condemned who did not believe the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness (2 Thess 2:10-12).
Ed Dowd has a teams that collects and analyzes publicly available data on vax injuries and death. In the short clip below he highlights that hematological (blood) disorders are over 500% above normal. It is a 61 standard deviation event meaning, as he says, that it's as likely to happen as a black hole approaching and swallowing Earth within the next 2 years. https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1703048210485326292?s=20
At this point, if I had young children, I would not allow a single vaccine. Hep-B which is given immediately after birth is the primary cause of Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) according to Robert F. Kennedy Jr. who heads the Children's Health Defense Fund. Also autism rates are now off the charts. I think it's expected that 1 in 30 children born today will have autism. The pediatric Well Baby Schedule should be more appropriately renamed the Vax Schedule because that's its purpose. That's what pediatricians are given money for both by insurance companies who pay bonuses based on the percentage of children vaxxed and by pharma companies who provide all types of perks all the time. Just as with the covid vaccine, I believe we, many of whom are parents or grandparents, have a duty to truly learn and communicate to those who'll listen how dangerous all vaccines are. They all contain many untested ingredients that can cause many health problems over the lifetime of the recipient. Dr. Tenpenny has been fully engaged in this fight for over 20 years. She and Dr. Palevsky, a pediatrician, often do presentations together recommending that parents keep their children away from pediatricians as much as possible. These 2 websites have great information: drtenpenny.com childrenshealthdefense.org
I used to think anti vaxers were eccentric. Goodness have I ever changed my tune since the virus. Now, for me, anything is possible.
Well at the moment I wouldn't risk one anyway. For anything. My trust is gone, gone, gone. I would have to think very long and hard...
But do you remember when we heard that this payload was supposed to stay in the shoulder muscle. And then we learned that Japanese researchers had to do biodistribution studies because there was no data on this released by the Pharma companies. The companies had to be forced to release thousands of pages of documentation by legal action. They tried to hide it for 40 years but were unsuccessful. I know people had to trawl through thousands of pages of stuff. I don't know if any biodistribution studies were ever found in that pile - but I suspect not. Why? Because, Pharma is paying Universities or contracting out the basic research that should have been done on lipid nanoparticle characteristics and distribution before injecting this cocktail. Take a look at this: https://rumble.com/v37uugv-cancelled-vaccinologist-exposes-fraudulent-vax-data.html And by the way, the Japanese found mRNA carried by the nanoparticles in lots of different tissues and organs. Ovaries, kidneys, endothelial cells, lungs etc. Dr. Bhakdi had warned that injecting spike protein mRNA was a very risky thing to do, because if it got into the bloodstream then it would end up in tissues and organs and in the lining of blood vessels and trigger micro blood clotting and possibly autoimmune inflammation. Apart from the moral imperative not to take this cocktail due to the link with embryonic kidney cells from aborted babies, I was not prepared to submit myself to this kind of Russian roullette. The technology to roll out billions of doses each supposedly containing billions of molecules of mRNA was never established with the essential quality control standards. I imagine it was a hit and miss operation across all components. Across manufacturing sites, across bioreactors, across batches, across mRNA synthesis, across lipid nanoparticle encapsulation. I should have shouted from the rooftops. I tried in the beginning but the pressure was too great. I guess I have to live with that.
We were conditioned to trust doctors. We did not question, we accepted. Our parents had us vaccinated for small pox and polio, and we did the same for our children with the addition of MMR, Tdap, chicken pox, etc. You would be considered negligent if you refused to comply with the childhood vaccination schedule, and this set the stage for compliance. It took the Covid jabs and lockdowns to wake us up to the dangers. Now they are rolling out this new RSV vaccine, targeting infants, mothers, and seniors.
I do not blame Pope Francis. I think he meant well. He is no scientist. He placed all his trust in the medical establishment. But even the medical establishment don't fully understand these new technologies or methods of delivery. They trusted the Pharma companies and the Universities. Everyone just goes along to get along. Everyone is in their silos trusting that someone else has got this. Even the Universities are compromised because they are beholden to funding from Big Pharma. The regulatory agencies are captured too. Staff go between regulatory agencies and big pharma. The medical publishing industry is also controlled by Big Pharma and Big Pharma is indemnified by Government against prosecution. Notice also that some of the biggest advocates for the vaxx were not themselves subjected to it. They even made a special batch for Pharma employees.
and Doctors want your babies to start taking the childhood vaccines as EARLY as possible. Why? Because 70+ more vaccines are lined up.
You said it! The Pope's no scientist. That says it all. Why then did he say there was a moral obligation to take the jab when he didn't even know basic facts that mRNA is not a vaccine? The mRNA shot is not a vaccine, but a form of experimental gene therapy – it is called a vaccine merely because it uses the same method of delivery as a vaccine. And it was experimental never tested properly for safety. Yet he used (abused) his moral authority to shame people into getting it because he said not do so was 'suicidal'. It was the reverse in fact it was damaging to take it with so many injuries, side effects and deaths.
I have heard whistleblower scientists/doctors in rumble or bitchute videos who said that the MMR vaccine is the one causing autism in children...
As I said, he trusted reputable doctors telling him many people were going to die unless vaccine mandates were implemented. It's not his job to know the difference between a vaccine and a gene therapy. Even you don't know the difference, garabandal, with respect. It is called a vaccine because the end product of the injected mRNA agent is a protein, and it is the protein which triggers an immune response. Before this new technology, classical vaccines only contained purified proteins along with chemicals to help stimulate an immune resoonse, the so called adjuvants (which are a bit controversial themselves as Dr. Wakefield and others say that they are in fact toxic). Technically, mRNA is not a gene (although RNA can be in certain organisms) but an intermediate between a gene (DNA) and a protein. Usually, mRNA is very unstable and falls apart but the Pharma companies modified the mRNA with pseudouridine to make it very stable. And this of course could be dangerous if the mRNA ends up where it shouldn't be - making a toxic spike protein in a cell that shouldn't be expressing it. There is also the risk that the mRNA could get converted into DNA (reverse transcribed) in a cell and then get integrated in a cellular gene. Such integrations could have unforseen consequenes, especially if they were to insert into a tumour suppressor gene and inactivate it. The chances of that are probably small but who can say? Until studies are done. There have been reports I think of spike mRNA ending up in cellular DNA but I don't have references. But you are right, this technology can be used for gene therapy too. They changed the definition of a vaccine in medical dictionaries to include mRNA, so again Pope Francis is just trusting the medical professionals. The trouble is the vast majority of medical professionals, are not molecular biologists or virologists or vaccinologists or immunologists, they just defer to the University specialists. It is unreasonable to expect Pope Francis to be read up on these things.
